Craig Henry, who should really write more, grasps the nettle - I quote in full, with all apologies for being a jerk, but it’s an important part of this whole media-driven Nervous Nellie discussion about the death of conservatism:
Perhaps someone can explain this to me
Right after the 9/11 attacks, Ann Coulter wrote an over the top column that called for vigorous action against the terrorists and their supporters. “We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.”
That was too much for National Review and the magazine eventually stopped running Coulter’s column.
In Coulter’s defense, her rant was written in the immediate aftermath of an atrocity and Coulter lost friends in the attack.
Nonetheless, Naional Review felt compelled to distance itself from Coulter for her insulting attacks on Muslims. Perfectly defensible.
Now, fast forward seven years. There is no terrorist attack, but the Republicans lose a hard fought election. One Kathleen Parker writes a series of columns attacking social conservatives and Evangelical Christians.
Somehow, Parker remains in good standing with National Review. They still run her column despite its bigotry towards the very conservatives that NR presumes to lead.
Oogedy-boogedy, in the words of Miss Parker. Mrs. Parker. WTFever.
See, there seriously is a disconnect between the so-called house organs, and the people they are selling organs to. Personally, I don’t know when it will reconnect, if it’s possible, or will something replace it? It’s about time for one of those.
Personally, I never subscribed to NR and I read it only irregularly. It reminds me too much of the things I dislike about all media — that incestuous circle-jerk of trust-fund English majors. In their defense, they have a large share of people typing for them who aren’t that way. Christopher Buckley, on the other hand, is so far ahead of the example pack, they’ve already called the race.