…and stare at it with wonder.
Sarah Palin and children conceived out of wedlock - an uncomfortable question needs to be posed
1. Sarah Palin’s first son, Track Palin, was born in April 1989 (we don’t have the exact day). Actually now we do, courtesy of FOX News’ Alan Colmes. He was born on April 20. For the purposes of this analysis, we will give Sarah Palin the benefit of the doubt and assume that her son was born on April 30, 1989, the longest possible April date from her marriage.
2. Sarah Palin was married on August 29, 1988. She eloped.
3. 38 weeks is the typical human pregnancy.
4. 38 weeks before her son’s birthday, April 20, 1989, is July 28, 1988 - i.e., that would be the hypothetical day of conception.
5. If this data is correct, that would mean that Sarah Palin eloped four weeks after her son’s conception.
6. Sarah Palin’s son could still be legitimate if he was born four weeks premature, AND if he was conceived on the night his parents eloped.
Yeah, and guess what? Same thing happened to me.
These twats aren’t uncomfortable with anything they’re typing into the internets. This is a whole-grain tofu turkey dinner with all the organic-local trimmings, and they’re quivering with delight over their pregnancy calculator. But it only works as long as you buy their hook that James Dobson is some kind of Grand Vizier who manages all conservative brain waves, which I think they might actually believe (remember — tweezer-brains.) NB: he doesn’t. James Dobson doesn’t mean a hill of beans to me or anyone else I know.
Yeah, they’re running truly scared. You might go and find some of the other HUA speculative bullshit the derangeoids are throwing around about her kids. I won’t link it — it’s heinously disgusting. But it’s a good indicator, another data point, on the thought-processes of our pals across the aisle.
As always — stay classy, Marxists.
There’s a knee-slapper in there, too, about this Dobson character: apparently, he was given (bought? was paid for?) space in a magazine to do some preaching about out-of-wedlock births or some such silly horseshit, which I guess really ruffles the feathers of the tweezer-brains. The magazine was, um, Time. You might remember that magazine from your last visit to the doctor’s office or to get your oil changed - it was is a weekly roundup of all the news. I’m as surprised as anyone to hear they still sell it. Whodathunk you can make a living selling week-old news?