• Who Be He?


    The Good Old Days

  •  

    July 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun   Aug »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
  • TFG Archives

  • AmazonMP3 Widget

The Nanny Nation

Posted by TFG on July 17th, 2007

Business: Cigarmakers in a panic

Eric Newman punches the numbers on his calculator and gapes at the results one more time.It’s no mathematical error: The federal government has proposed raising taxes on premium cigars, the kind Newman’s family has been rolling for decades in Ybor City, by as much as 20,000 percent.

As part of an increase in tobacco taxes designed to pay for children’s health insurance, the nickel-per-cigar tax that has ruled the industry could rise to as much as $10 per cigar.

Aren’t we getting close to a mutiny here somewhere? Does a cigar maker throw up barricades, arm themselves to the teeth, and tell the revenuers to come and get the fooking tax? Black market, perhaps?

Or is America just a land of sheep, content with their lot? Extremely healthy sheep, with no vices. But then — sheep don’t have vices, do they? Neither are their parents expected to be responsible for keeping the kids healthy - that’s someone else’s job. That guy that keeps shearing them, that’s whose job.  Who’s that, these days?

Here’s the source of the controversy: The Democrat controlled Congress has sought an extra $35-billion to $50-billion for the state children’s health insurance program. The program distributes payments to the states to help buy coverage for kids not poor enough for Medicaid.

If that last sentence doesn’t compute for you, like it doesn’t for me — well, you’re a heartless bastard to question why the federal government is helping kids not poor enough for Medicaid.  Which seems to me, if you do the math, that now the Federales are responsible for every kid, every where, all the time.  Either you’re poor enough for Medicaid, or…you’re not, right?

Well, this is what you get, America — a good, hard screwing.  Shut up and take it like a sheep.

2 Responses to “The Nanny Nation”

  1. Dick Stanley Says:

    This is why I back term limits for these corrupt, elitest politicians of ours, although it might make them even more likely to merely follow the latest poll results. Some science fiction writer, Bradbury, maybe it was, had pols in the future doing just that on a live, minute-by-minute basis. I also like the Porkbusters thingie Instapundit and others are pushing. The Web is a wonderful media. Think how little of this we knew beforehand. What do you bet they try to include us in the return-of-the-”fairness”-doctrine? I’m sure they hate being second-guessed. Tough.

  2. charles austin Says:

    I guess I’ll have to keep smoking no matter what it costs — for the children!