Bad Old Energy
Posted by TFG on 10th August 2005
Maybe. The risk is that if we are able to cook the books and make nuclear seem the best fix to sustain our insatiable habit for energy, this will turn money and attention away from incresing efficiency and conserving. The bottom line: we want what we’ve always had and more and don’t want to consider anything but growth at any price. Nuclear will allow us to get by another generation, perhaps two, with our gargantuan environmental footprint. And nuclear, of course, will not power our SUV’s or power shipping and commerce needs in ships, trains, and air transport.
Sorry, Fred, but I’m just not going to tell my grandkids that they are going to be required to learn to read by…what? Bio-diesel? Or maybe they should just give up the reading, since it takes tallow to make them candles. And just forget about getting out of this river bottom, unless you’re going to walk out.
I’ve never quite understood this insistence from the greenies that now that they have theirs, everybody else can just go hang. Mother Earth was ripped to shreds decades ago to provide the vast majority of resources required to get to this happy turn. And if I’m not mistaken, Fred still has a couple of fossil-fuel driven vehicles that help him get from there, with the woodburning fireplace and large garden and gorgeous creek, to here and put food on the table. So, until those trucks are turned into planters and the PC (and server it connects to) is running on bird-friendly wind energy, could we please stop the misery-shouting about our dependence on freaking energy? Everybody sucking in oxygen today needs it, and will continue to need it, and those needs are going to do naught but grow.
Damn, I’m cranky, but this kind of bullcrap makes me that way. Nuclear-schmuclear — might as well kill myself so that we don’t hurt Gaia any more. No putting your brain to it, no putting your shoulder to it…just sit there in the darkness. Crikey.
Posted in Bidness | No Comments »



